ArticleThe breast journal2026
Identifying Disparities in Timely Receipt of Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Article in The breast journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identifying Disparities in Timely Receipt of Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery.The breast journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery reduces local recurrence and improves survival. The new standard set forth by the Commission on Cancer (CoC) requires that radiation be initiated in less than or equal to 60 days of definitive surgery for patients receiving breast-conserving surgery for Stages I-III breast cancer who do not undergo adjuvant chemo or immunotherapy. Timely access to radiation is critical, and yet there still exists a modest number of patients who experience delays in the initiation of radiation. We aim to highlight this disparity at our institution and identify the socioeconomic factors that contribute to it. Methods: Using the Breast Cancer Registry, we conducted a retrospective analysis of women diagnosed with Stages I-III breast cancer, who underwent breast-conserving surgery between 2011 and 2021. Women who received chemotherapy were excluded. We stratified patients based on socioeconomic and other factors and examined which factors attributed to an increased interval from surgery to initiation of radiation greater than the current standard of 60 days. Results: A cohort of 427 women meeting the inclusion criteria was identified. Most patients received adjuvant radiation within the new standard of 60 days from definitive surgery (72.4%). However, patients of White race were significantly more likely to receive adjuvant radiation within 60 days of final surgery (74.7%) compared to patients of Black race (55.6%). In addition, patients with private insurance or Medicare were more likely to receive adjuvant radiation within the current set standard (74.9% and 74.5%, respectively) in comparison to patients with Medicaid (50.0%). Conclusion: This analysis identifies disparities in breast cancer treatment among minority populations at our institution. It also suggests that insurance status can affect the receipt of treatment in a recommended time frame. There is research that shows a delay in radiation impairs survival. These results indicate that improving access to timely adjuvant radiation may be leveraged to lessen disparities experienced by minority races regardless of insurance status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.