Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41641173›Full record

ArticleThe breast journal2026

Identifying Disparities in Timely Receipt of Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Nicole Reyes, Camila Ortega, Amanda Mendiola, Mary Murray, Andrew Fenton, Adina Brett-Morris, Caroline Mangira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The breast journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicole ReyesDepartment of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, 1 Akron General Ave, Akron, 44307, Ohio, USA, akrongeneral.org.
Camila OrtegaDepartment of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, 1 Akron General Ave, Akron, 44307, Ohio, USA, akrongeneral.org.
Amanda MendiolaDepartment of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, 1 Akron General Ave, Akron, 44307, Ohio, USA, akrongeneral.org.ORCID 0000-0003-1445-0558
Mary MurrayDepartment of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, 1 Akron General Ave, Akron, 44307, Ohio, USA, akrongeneral.org.ORCID 0000-0003-1110-9936
Andrew FentonDepartment of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, 1 Akron General Ave, Akron, 44307, Ohio, USA, akrongeneral.org.
Adina Brett-MorrisDepartment of Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, 1 Akron General Ave, Akron, 44307, Ohio, USA, akrongeneral.org.
Caroline MangiraDepartment of Research, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, 1 Akron General Ave, Akron, 44307, Ohio, USA, akrongeneral.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery reduces local recurrence and improves survival. The new standard set forth by the Commission on Cancer (CoC) requires that radiation be initiated in less than or equal to 60 days of definitive surgery for patients receiving breast-conserving surgery for Stages I-III breast cancer who do not undergo adjuvant chemo or immunotherapy. Timely access to radiation is critical, and yet there still exists a modest number of patients who experience delays in the initiation of radiation. We aim to highlight this disparity at our institution and identify the socioeconomic factors that contribute to it. Methods: Using the Breast Cancer Registry, we conducted a retrospective analysis of women diagnosed with Stages I-III breast cancer, who underwent breast-conserving surgery between 2011 and 2021. Women who received chemotherapy were excluded. We stratified patients based on socioeconomic and other factors and examined which factors attributed to an increased interval from surgery to initiation of radiation greater than the current standard of 60 days. Results: A cohort of 427 women meeting the inclusion criteria was identified. Most patients received adjuvant radiation within the new standard of 60 days from definitive surgery (72.4%). However, patients of White race were significantly more likely to receive adjuvant radiation within 60 days of final surgery (74.7%) compared to patients of Black race (55.6%). In addition, patients with private insurance or Medicare were more likely to receive adjuvant radiation within the current set standard (74.9% and 74.5%, respectively) in comparison to patients with Medicaid (50.0%). Conclusion: This analysis identifies disparities in breast cancer treatment among minority populations at our institution. It also suggests that insurance status can affect the receipt of treatment in a recommended time frame. There is research that shows a delay in radiation impairs survival. These results indicate that improving access to timely adjuvant radiation may be leveraged to lessen disparities experienced by minority races regardless of insurance status.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHealthcare DisparitiesMastectomy, SegmentalTime-to-TreatmentAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRegistriesRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSocioeconomic FactorsTreatment Delay

Identifiers

PMID41641173
PMCPMC12865119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.