ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Rapid diagnostic value of next-generation sequencing-based technologies in childhood pneumonia.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study evaluates the diagnostic efficacy of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in pediatric patients with suspected pneumonia and unidentified etiologies. Objective: This retrospective study encompassed pediatric patients with suspected pneumonia, spanning the period from January 2022 to December 2023. Nasal swabs and blood samples were collected for a comprehensive diagnostic panel, including NGS, blood culture, complete blood count, and serum biomarkers. Methods: Routine diagnostic tests were compared with NGS for turnaround time and diagnostic accuracy. Patients were categorized based on clinical diagnosis into non-pneumonia and pneumonia groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of pneumonia. Results: NGS provided results within 24 h, significantly faster than conventional bacterial cultures (3-5 days). The positivity rate for pathogen identification increased from 55.3% with traditional methods to 86.2% with NGS ( Conclusion: NGS is a promising tool for rapid and accurate etiologic diagnosis of pneumonia in children. The combination of NGS with albumin levels may serve as an effective screening strategy, potentially enhancing clinical management through earlier intervention and targeted therapy. Further validation in larger cohorts is warranted to establish the clinical utility of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.