ArticleFujita medical journal2026
In-hospital systems for organ donation after brain death in Japan: A nation-wide survey-advancing brain-dead organ donation systems in Japan.
Article in Fujita medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sequence and timing of organ donation discussions in brain-dead donors: a subanalysis of the J-RESPECT study.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Brain-dead organ donations in Japan remain significantly fewer than in other countries, highlighting inadequacies in the organ donation system. This study aimed to examine the state of organ donation systems in hospitals that have conducted brain-dead organ donations and to explore potential in-hospital improvements. Methods: Among 148 hospitals that carried out at least one brain-dead organ donation between 2018 and 2023, 84 participated in an anonymous, self-administered online survey, yielding a 57% response rate. Results: A total of 96% of responding hospitals reported having in-hospital donor coordinators (IHCos), with an average of 7.0±6.0. Their IHCo teams included nurses in 98%, physicians in 50%, and administrative staff in 27% of hospitals. A significant positive correlation was observed between the numbers of organ donation options presented and actual organ donations. Hospitals offering more options tended to have six or more IHCos and/or a system for identifying potential donors. Furthermore, hospitals with full-time IHCos had significantly more deceased organ donors. Conclusions: Appropriate allocation of IHCos and the establishment of a system to identify potential donors can enhance the assessment of patients' or their families' willingness to donate organs and support the successful completion of the donation process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.