ArticleFujita medical journal2026
Antimicrobial use in patients with end-of-life status in intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Fujita medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antibiotics must be part of end-of-life decisions: a necessary evil?Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Advances in critical care have increased antimicrobial use in intensive care units (ICUs), often extending to end-of-life patients without clear clinical benefit. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated antimicrobial use in critically ill ICU patients with end-of-life care status. Methods: A comprehensive search of Medline (PubMed) and Embase identified articles published from January 2000 through August 2023. Interventional and observational studies focusing on antimicrobial use for critically ill ICU patients with end-of-life status were included. Study types, demographics, clinical characteristics, and antimicrobial use (i.e., continuation or discontinuation) were extracted. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the proportion of antimicrobial use, with subgroup analyses by region and national income status. Results: From 13,542 publications, 26 studies met the inclusion criteria; no randomized or prospective studies were identified. Thirteen studies (50.0%) reported antimicrobial use and were included in the quantitative synthesis. The pooled proportion of antimicrobial prescriptions was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.18-0.54) with significant heterogeneity (I Conclusions: Despite increasing emphasis on judicious antimicrobial use, studies comprehensively assessing antimicrobial prescribing in ICU patients with end-of-life care status remain scarce. Based on the limited available evidence, approximately one-third of such patients received antimicrobials. Regional differences in prescribing patterns were also observed, potentially influencing overall antimicrobial consumption in ICUs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.