Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41641113›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2026

Convolutional Graph Isomorphism Network to Detect Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects.

Douglas R da Costa, Dániel Unyi, Rafael Scherer, Rohit Muralidhar, Mario Luiz Ribeiro Monteiro, Felipe A Medeiros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Douglas R da CostaBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Dániel UnyiFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Department of Telecommunications and Artificial Intelligence, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
Rafael SchererBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Rohit MuralidharBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Mario Luiz Ribeiro MonteiroDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Felipe A MedeirosBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a deep learning (DL) model based on graph isomorphism networks (GINs) for detecting glaucomatous visual field defects on 24-2 standard automated perimetry (SAP) and to compare it against traditional diagnostic criteria, a dense neural network (NN) model, and a convolutional neural network (CNN) model. Design: A cross-sectional retrospective study. Participants: 1874 reliable SAP tests (Humphrey Field Analyzer, Carl-Zeiss Meditec Inc.) from 1009 eyes of 676 patients. Methods: Standard automated perimetry tests were classified as normal or abnormal due to glaucomatous damage by two glaucoma specialists, with adjudication by a third. A GIN architecture was developed to classify tests using full 54-point spatial SAP data modeled as graphs, with node features comprising sensitivity, total deviation, and pattern deviation values. The dataset was split at the patient level (60% training/validation, 40% testing). The GIN model's diagnostic performance was compared to the Anderson criteria, the glaucoma hemifield test/pattern standard deviation (GHT/PSD) criteria, a fully connected dense NN, and a CNN model. Main Outcome Measures: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), precision-recall curve, sensitivity at 95% specificity, F1-score, repeatability, and model explainability. Results: Among the 1874 SAP tests, 70.0% were graded as abnormal. The GIN model achieved an AUC of 0.982, significantly outperforming the Anderson criteria (AUC: 0.906, Conclusions: By modeling SAP as a graph and incorporating spatial relationships among test points, the GIN model provided superior diagnostic performance and interpretability relative to traditional criteria and standard NNs. This graph-based approach offers a promising tool for accurate and explainable detection of glaucomatous visual field defects in clinical practice. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Deep learningGlaucomatous visual field defectsGraph isomorphism networkGraph neural networksStandard automated perimetry

Identifiers

PMID41641113
PMCPMC12864662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.