ArticleDiscover psychology2026
Enhancing MRI accessibility through community engagement for autistic young adults.
Article in Discover psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Practical considerations for dense longitudinal neuroimaging: Ten simple rules for frequent scanning over short time periods.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study, a community-engaged research initiative, was specifically designed to enhance MRI accessibility and optimize the overall experience for autistic Latino young adults. Crucially, we employed a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach, ensuring that the voices and perspectives of the target community were central to every stage of inquiry. Insights were gathered from Community Scientist meetings and 18 autistic Latino young adults (ages 18-25) through focus groups with nine MRI-naïve individuals and individual interviews with a separate cohort of nine individuals who had prior MRI experience. Transcripts from these sessions underwent thematic analysis to identify key patterns related to MRI barriers and facilitators. Participants voiced initial apprehension and the challenging sensory experience of MRI noise as a primary barrier. To counter this, participants overwhelmingly desired enhanced preparation and information, specifically emphasizing the value of mock scanner simulations and readily available, in-depth explanations delivered in culturally and linguistically accessible language. A robust theme was the profound importance of human connection and unwavering support from both research staff and family members. A key motivational factor identified was the strong desire for personalized results and feedback from their MRI scans. While monetary compensation was acknowledged as a clear and effective incentive, altruism and genuine scientific curiosity also significantly drove participation. Practical suggestions for improvement included enhancing physical comfort within the scanner, providing better visual aids, and proactively addressing common logistical barriers such as transportation to the facility. This CBPR-driven research provides actionable insights to design more comfortable, transparent, and culturally responsive MRI protocols, thereby fostering greater participation of autistic adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.