ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Translation and validation of the German version of the Systemic Inventory of Change.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: The Systemic Therapy Inventory of Change (STIC) is designed to measure changes in family, couple, and individual therapy from a multisystemic and multidimensional perspective. The aim of the present study was to translate the English version of the STIC into German and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the German version in a clinical sample of 309 patients starting outpatient psychotherapy covered by the German Statutory Health Insurance. Methods: Patients were recruited between July 2023 and November 2024 at Heidelberg Institute for Psychotherapy (HIP) of the University Hospital Heidelberg. In addition to the STIC, several other questionnaires were completed by the participants, including the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), Experience in Close Relationships (ECR-RD-8), and the Systemic Clinical Outcome and Routine Evaluation (SCORE-15). Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the STIC subscales and the corresponding criterion measures. Results: Significant correlations with various outcome measures between 0.26 and 0.81 demonstrated the construct validity of the German version of the STIC. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that higher scores on the subscale IPS (Individual Problems and Strengths) and RWP (Relationship with Partner) were significantly associated with higher quality of life. Conclusion: The questionnaire could be used in psychotherapy settings for routine outcome monitoring and psychotherapy research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.