ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Case report: A five-case series of 18-month home use of a conversational companion robot for psychological support in older people with mild cognitive impairment or late-onset psychosis.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Conversational AI in Cognitive and Social Training for People with Dementia: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although companion robots have demonstrated psychological benefits for older adults, most studies have focused on short-term use or institutional settings. This case series with integrated qualitative analysis describes five cases involving the long-term use of a conversational companion robot (RoBoHoN, Sharp) among community-dwelling women aged 85 to 90 with mild cognitive impairment or late-onset psychosis. After an initial exploratory phase (2-5 months) and a 2-month washout, the robot was installed in each home for 18 months. All participants operated the robot in daily life, with only intermittent light-touch support from caregivers or the team when needed. Usability assessments showed high satisfaction and ease of use. Although standardised psychological scales showed no consistent improvements, participants reported enjoying conversations with the robot. Four of the five expressed a desire to continue using the robot after the study. These findings support the feasibility and potential long-term acceptability of companion robots among cognitively challenged older adults living at home. The case series suggests such robots may foster sustained engagement even in vulnerable populations. Further studies with larger samples are needed to evaluate the psychological effects of long-term companion robot use in home settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.