Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41641061›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health2025

Perceptions and Acceptability of Doxycycline-Based STI Prophylaxis: Insights from Consumers and Healthcare Providers in Queensland.

Daniel Demant, Philip Ra Baker, Amy B Mullens, Faye McMillan, Jacintha Manton, Julie-Anne Carroll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Caddyshack in the Illawarra Shoalhaven: Evaluating a Multi-Platform Sexual Health Promotion Programme.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2027
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel DemantSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3330-2972
Philip Ra BakerSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2834-5436
Amy B MullensSchool of Psychology and Wellbeing, Centre for Health Research, Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0939-9842
Faye McMillanSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9441-7805
Jacintha MantonSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2316-2306
Julie-Anne CarrollSchool of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0770-6527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study examines the perceptions and acceptability of daily doxycycline-based prophylaxis (Doxy-PrEP) for bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among populations at heightened risk of STIs and healthcare providers in Queensland, Australia. It explores factors influencing willingness to use or prescribe this intervention, including potential ethical and clinical concerns. Methods: Two cross-sectional online surveys were conducted in 2024 - one targeting consumers at higher risk for STIs, including gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men, sex workers, young adults, culturally diverse people as well as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples (Indigenous Australians). The other survey targeted healthcare providers with prescribing rights. Recruitment was conducted via social media, community organizations and professional networks. Statistical analyses assessed demographic, behavioral and experiential predictors of Doxy-PrEP acceptability. Results: Consumer perceptions of Doxy-PrEP were shaped by prior biomedical prevention use, particularly HIV PrEP, as well as age, with older participants expressing greater acceptance. Perceived STI risk and previous antibiotic use were also associated with willingness to use Doxy-PrEP. Ethical concerns focused on antibiotic resistance, reduced condom use, and healthcare burden. Among providers, awareness of Doxy-PEP was high, with most viewing it as an evidence-based practice. Support for Doxy-PrEP was more "conditional", with concerns about long-term antibiotic resistance and adherence. Conclusions: Findings highlight complex social and clinical considerations in the potential implementation of Doxy-PrEP. While consumer interest suggests a role for this intervention in STI prevention, ethical concerns and provider hesitancy require clear guidelines, education, and regulatory oversight. Future research should examine long-term implications for antimicrobial resistance and STI prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Doxycyclinepatient acceptance of health carepre-exposure prophylaxissexual healthsexually transmittable infections

Identifiers

PMID41641061
PMCPMC12867362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.