ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2025
A Prospective Multicenter Luminex-Based Clinical Algorithm to Define Unacceptable HLA Mismatches Before Kidney Transplantation. Consequences on Outcome, Waiting Time, and Wait List Composition.
Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determination of unacceptable human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches (UAM) before kidney transplantation (KT) aims at minimizing immunological risk and routinely involves Luminex single antigen bead (SAB) testing. SAB-UAM criteria, however, often lack standardization. We implemented standardized mean fluorescence intensity (MFI)-based SAB-UAM criteria in four German transplant centers and prospectively studied the consequences on waitlist composition as well as waiting time, early antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and graft loss in 267 patients. HLA were deemed unacceptable in case of CDC-reactivity or antibodies against known HLA from previous transplants irrespective of MFI. For all other antibodies, the MFI cut-off was 5.000 with the exception of 10.000 for anti-HLA DQ. We observed significant accumulation of highly sensitized patients (virtual panel-reactivity >95%) on the waiting list during the study period. Median time to KT was longer in patients with UAM, but differences were not statistically significant. Patients with preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) below the UAM cut-off criteria (39/267) experienced more AMR episodes compared to DSA-negative patients (10.3% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001). Graft survival, however, was not statistically different over a median follow-up of four years. Standardized SAB-UAM criteria associated with good short-term outcomes but resulted in accumulation of highly sensitized patients on the waiting list.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.