ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Biomechanical comparison of two squatting protocols in adolescents and young adults with femoracetabular impingement syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Squatting is an important activity of daily living which can be particularly useful in the management of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome (FAIS). However, double-leg squat protocols can vary significantly, potentially impacting biomechanical outcomes. A squat with a "hold" before the ascent phase represents one variation which increases muscular endurance demands and may elucidate such impacts. The purpose of this study was to identify biomechanical differences between a traditional squat (TSquat) and squat with a hold (HSquat) in adolescents and young adults with pre-operative FAIS. Methods: Participants ( Results: Participants squatted lower in the TSquat than the HSquat (42.6% ± 12.8% vs. 36.0% ± 13.0%, Discussion: Participants with FAIS squatted to a shallower depth during the HSquat compared to the TSquat and displayed altered biomechanics, accordingly. Given these findings, greater standardization of squatting techniques is warranted as technique variations may affect outcomes, and researchers must consider potential adjustments made by those with FAIS in their natural squat movement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.