ReviewWorld journal of hepatology2026
Evaluation methods of hepatic steatosis: From conventional techniques to emerging biomarkers.
Review in World journal of hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of hepatic steatosis is essential for diagnosing, staging, and monitoring metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. This review comprehensively overviews conventional and emerging hepatic steatosis evaluation methods. Noninvasive imaging techniques such as ultrasound, controlled attenuation parameter, and magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction are discussed alongside invasive reference standards such as liver biopsy. The review also highlights the role of blood-based biomarkers, including fibroblast growth factor 21, cytokeratin-18, type III procollagen peptide, and Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer, as well as novel approaches such as epigenetic markers, artificial intelligence-assisted imaging, and digital pathology. Each method is presented with consideration of its diagnostic performance, clinical utility, and limitations. By integrating these modalities into multimodal assessment strategies and incorporating dynamic endpoints such as magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (known as magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction)-based fat reduction as a therapeutic response marker, clinicians can improve diagnostic accuracy, risk stratification, and therapeutic guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.