ArticleWorld journal of hepatology2026
Impact of clinically significant portal hypertension on posthepatectomy liver failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in World journal of hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe health challenges of partial hepatectomy in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) have been a subject of study for decades. No meta-analysis has systematically evaluated the relationship between CSPH and posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), despite its potential role as a critical factor in surgical decision-making. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the incidence of PHLF in patients with and without CSPH.
aimTo include more recent studies and focus on short-term postoperative outcomes, particularly the association between CSPH and PHLF. Additionally, stratified analyses were also performed according to CSPH and PHLF assessment methods, study design, study period, surgical technique, and underlying liver diseases.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Elsevier, and Cochrane databases using combinations of the following terms: ("portal hypertension" OR "hypertension, portal" OR "portal hypertensions") AND ("hepatectomy" OR "hepatectomies" OR "liver resection") AND ("liver failure" OR "hepatic failure" OR "liver decompensation"). Studies published from January 1996 to April 2025, 21 published studies were finally included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The quality assessment was performed independently by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and compared using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with the
resultsA total of 6981 patients (1453 patients with CSPH and 5529 patients without CSPH) were finally included in this study. Compared with patients without CSPH, the incidences of PHLF increased in patients with CSPH (OR = 3.14; 95%CI: 2.45-4.02;
conclusionThe presence of CSPH should be considered as a significant risk factor, it still should be taken into account seriously prior to surgery and needs strict perioperative management. Meanwhile, different methods of diagnosing CSPH could influence PHLF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.