ReviewCureus2026
Management of Complications Following Botulinum Toxin Facial Injections: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Review
- Skin Temperature as a Marker of Vasomotor Response and Restoration of Blood Flow After Aesthetic Botulinum Toxin Therapy in the Forehead.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is widely used in the management of neurological disorders and in aesthetic medicine. Although generally safe, facial injections may be associated with complications with relevant functional or aesthetic impact. This narrative review aimed to summarize reported facial complications following BoNT injections and to describe available management strategies. A PubMed search up to November 2025 identified 239 articles; after screening and full-text review, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. Data were synthesized narratively due to the heterogeneity of study designs. Upper eyelid ptosis was the most frequently reported clinically significant complication and was mainly managed with topical alpha-adrenergic agonists. Diplopia was rare but functionally disabling and was treated conservatively with occlusion or prisms or with targeted extraocular BoNT injection in selected cases. Ocular surface changes, facial asymmetry, perioral dysfunction, local reactions, and headache were generally mild and self-limited. Systemic adverse events were uncommon but occasionally required hospital evaluation. Overall, management strategies were predominantly conservative and supported by low-level evidence. Facial BoNT injections are generally safe, but clinically relevant complications can occur. Management is largely conservative, apraclonidine 0.5% is most commonly used for toxin-induced ptosis, and oxymetazoline 0.1% (FDA-approved for acquired blepharoptosis) is an additional option; other events are treated symptomatically. Overall, evidence is limited, supporting the need for prospective studies and standardized management pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.