ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2026
Role of pancreatoscopy in the management of suspected and confirmed intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) are pre-malignant tumours of the pancreas with variable malignant potential. Imaging often fails to map the disease extent accurately and guidelines differ on surgical thresholds. Pancreatoscopy, providing direct visualisation of the pancreatic duct and the option of targeted biopsies, may be able to delineate disease boundaries and improve preoperative and intraoperative decision-making. This mini-review appraises the current role, evidence base, and technical application of pancreatoscopy in the management of suspected or confirmed IPMN, with particular focus on its impact on the extent of pancreatic resections. Reported data show detection of additional lesions in about 20%-40% of cases and changes to operative strategy in roughly one third of patients, with low complication rates and high concordance between visual features and histology. Limitations include restricted availability, learning requirements, heterogeneity of technique, absence of a standardised visual classification, and a paucity of prospective outcome data; current international guidelines remain cautious. Pancreatoscopy is a promising adjunct to refine patient selection and the extent of resection in IPMN, particularly for delineating ductal spread and guiding margins. Routine adoption will require robust prospective studies to define diagnostic accuracy, impact on recurrence and survival, and cost-effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.