Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41640856›Full record

ArticleNPJ dementia2026

Proper name anomia in people with Alzheimer's disease: implications for diagnosis and treatment-a systematic review.

Aygun Badalova, Joshua Stott, Alex P Leff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ dementia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aygun BadalovaUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Joshua StottADAPTlab, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, London, UK.
Alex P LeffUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proper name anomia (PNA) is a common experience that can become unpleasantly amplified in people with Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this systematic review, we discuss the key cognitive stages where naming can fail: facial recognition, person-specific semantics, and proper-name retrieval. We examine claims that PNA is an early indicator of AD and review studies that have attempted to treat PNA in individuals with AD. Twenty-two eligible studies were included. The main findings are that individuals with AD frequently experience difficulties in recalling proper names at any point in the disease process, with the distribution of functional breakdown between the three key cognitive stages involved in successful naming being: facial recognition (19%), person-specific semantics (30%), and proper-name retrieval (40%). PNA can be an early manifestation of AD. Effective behavioural treatments are available for those whose naming difficulties occur at the retrieval stage, including trial-by-trial practice using vanishing cues and spaced retrieval. We also provide clinical recommendations regarding the diagnosis and treatment of PNA.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseAttentionCognitive ageingCognitive neuroscienceDementiaDiseasesLanguageLearning and memoryNeural ageingNeurodegenerationNeurodegenerative diseasesNeurological disordersNeurovascular disordersParkinson's diseasePreclinical research

Identifiers

PMID41640856
PMCPMC12864043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.