ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Post-licensure safety surveillance of 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine using the vaccine adverse event reporting system, 2014-2024.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: On December 10, 2014, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licensed the 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine (9vHPV) for prevention of HPV-related cancers and genital warts. This study aimed to summarize and characterize the first decade of post-licensure surveillance reports of 9vHPV submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Methods: We analyzed VAERS reports following 9vHPV administration in the U.S. during December 2014 through December 2024. Disproportionality analysis was conducted using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) to identify potential safety signals. Reports were categorized by sex, age, seriousness, and clinical outcomes. Results: The VAERS received 23,499 reports following administration of 9vHPV: 46.7% were from females, 25.7% from males, and 27.6% with unreported sex. Overall, 92.5% of reports were nonserious. Syncope, dizziness, loss of consciousness and pallor were most common AEs among nonserious reports. Headache, dizziness, pain and syncope were commonly reported serious AEs. Disproportionality analysis identified six MedDRA PTs that were disproportionately reported following 9vHPV vaccination: anaphylactic shock, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), dizziness postural, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), premature menopause and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). Deaths ( Conclusion: The safety profile of 9vHPV over its first decade of use remains consistent with pre-licensure data, with most AEs being nonserious and self-limiting. Disproportionality analysis identified potential safety signals warranting further investigation but did not confirm causality. Continuous surveillance is necessary to further evaluate these rare events and ensure the ongoing safety of 9vHPV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.