ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2026
Classification status of drugs generally used for self-medication in children: a targeted review of regulatory documents.
Review in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Self-medication given by parents or caregivers is a common practice among children. Several frequently used drugs are often administered without professional supervision. This study compares regulatory classifications of common paediatric self-medication drugs across ten countries, aiming to uncover trends based on product type and national policies. Methods: Data were primarily collected from official drug regulatory agency websites and supplemented from other relevant sources. Twelve widely used drugs were reviewed, by focusing on classification status, approved indications, and paediatric age restrictions. Content and comparative analyses were conducted. Results: The findings revealed that drugs indicated for fever, pain, mucolytic effects, and non-sedating antihistamines were mostly classified as non-prescription. For drugs with the same active ingredient, but different strengths or dosage forms, compared within the same country, the classification status generally remained unchanged, even across different paediatric age groups. Drugs for asthma and topical corticosteroids were likely to be classified as prescription drugs. In some countries, such as the United Kingdom, Australia, and Singapore, the same drug preparation had different classification statuses which were based on factors such as approved indication and pack size. Additionally, Singapore and Indonesia implement prescription-exemption systems. These allow supply of certain prescription drugs without a prescription under specific conditions. Conclusion: Commonly used drugs for paediatric self-medication are classified as both non-prescription and prescription. This reflects diverse regulatory approaches across countries. Regulators play a key role in ensuring safe use of self-medication in children. Lack of harmonisation address a critical need for globally consistent paediatric drug classification scheme. They empower consumers through mechanisms such as clear, accessible patient information leaflets and other educational tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.