Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41640809›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025

ecg2o: a seamless extension of g2o for equality-constrained factor graph optimization.

Anas Abdelkarim, Daniel Görges, Holger Voos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anas AbdelkarimInterdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SnT), University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Daniel GörgesDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering (EIT), RPTU University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Holger VoosInterdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SnT), University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Factor graph optimization serves as a fundamental framework for robotic perception, enabling applications such as pose estimation, simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM), structure-from-motion (SfM), and situational modeling. Traditionally, these methods solve unconstrained least squares problems using algorithms such as Gauss-Newton and Levenberg-Marquardt. However, extending factor graphs with native support for hard equality constraints can yield more accurate state estimates and broaden their applicability, particularly in planning and control. Prior work has addressed equality handling either by soft penalties (large weights) or by nested-loop Augmented Lagrangian (AL) schemes. In this paper, we propose a novel extension of factor graphs that seamlessly incorporates hard equality constraints without requiring additional optimization techniques. Our approach maintains the efficiency and flexibility of existing second-order optimization techniques while ensuring constraint satisfaction. To validate the proposed method, an autonomous-vehicle velocity-tracking optimal control problem is solved and benchmarked against an AL baseline, both implemented in g2o. Additional comparisons are conducted in GTSAM, where the penalty method and AL are evaluated against our g2o implementations. Moreover, we introduce ecg2o, a header-only C++ library that extends the widely used g2o library with full support for hard equality-constrained optimization. This library, along with demonstrative examples and the optimal control problem, is available as open source at https://github.com/snt-arg/ecg2o.

Indexed as

constrained factor graphsequality-constrained optimizationoptimal controlSLAMSQP

Identifiers

PMID41640809
PMCPMC12864083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.