ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2026
Investigating the association between urban rural classification with fragility fractures and bone density in the UK: evidence from a large observational clinical cohort.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Geographic variation in fracture risk exists across the UK, yet rural/urban differences in fracture risk and bone density have yet to be explored. We aimed to investigate associations between rural urban classification (RUC) and bone health outcomes in a UK clinical population. Methods: We analysed patients who underwent DXA scanning between June 2004 and May 2025 in northwest England. Geographic status was assessed using the 2011 UK Census RUC. Multiple imputation with parameter pooling was performed with logistic and linear regression models adjusted for Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) risk factors to investigate the associations between urban and rural residence and major osteoporotic fractures, hip fractures, bone mineral density and body composition. Results: Of 40 951 eligible patients, 32 324 (79%) were women with a mean age of 68.2 years; 11 811 major osteoporotic fractures were reported including 2208 hip fractures. No significant association existed between rural/urban status and odds of having a previous fragility fracture [major osteoporotic fractures: odds ratio (OR) 0.97 (95% CI 0.92, 1.02); hip fractures: OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.90, 1.07)]. Rural residence was associated with lower osteoporosis odds [femoral neck OR 0.86 (95% CI 0.80, 0.92); lumbar spine OR 0.85 (95% CI 0.80, 0.91)]. Rural patients had significantly lower regional body fat [femoral fat percentage: β = -0.45 (95% CI -0.55, -0.34), Conclusions: Rural residence was associated with improved bone density and body composition but was not associated with fragility fractures in our referred UK clinical cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.