ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2025
Laser Hair Reduction to the Residuum Improves Quality of Life in People with Amputations.
Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People with amputations using limb prosthetics commonly develop dermatologic complications, such as impaired skin integrity and folliculitis, at the residuum-prosthesis interface (RPI). Dermatologic complications are the primary cause of dissatisfaction with prosthetics, hindering rehabilitation and leading to prosthesis abandonment. This has a deleterious impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Positive outcomes have been associated with laser hair reduction (LHR) for those with traumatic lower limb amputations; however, this has not been studied in those with upper limb amputations or amputations due to other conditions. We performed a prospective study to assess the effects of skin conditions at the RPI on HRQOL and determine the potential benefit from LHR. Four patients were identified: 75% (n=3) with lower-limb amputations and 25% (n=1) with upper limb amputations. Amputation indications included infection (25%, n=1), congenital malformations (25%, n=1) and trauma (50%, n=2). Participants received 6 sessions of LHR, either alexandrite 755nm alone or in combination with Nd:YAG 1064nm laser. The Skindex-16 survey was performed along with 7 amputee-specific questions. Improvements in HRQOL were seen in all patients and subscales, with an overall average improvement of 50%. Functioning subscale improvement was greatest, at 60%. All patients (100%) were satisfied with LHR treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the impact of LHR on the HRQOL of people with upper and lower limb prostheses. LHR is a minimally invasive technique to treat and prevent common dermatologic complications of the RPI, promoting improved self-confidence and prosthesis fit. This study identified an important role for dermatologists to engage with this community to improve their functional capacity and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41640788PMC12867527What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.