ArticleComputational statistics2025
A latent class pattern mixture model for nonignorable nonresponses in multivariate categorical data.
Article in Computational statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Survey data using categorical item variables are widely used in applied research such as psychology, education, and behavioral studies. Unfortunately, survey data are highly susceptible to nonignorable missing values that may threaten the validity of statistical inference if naively ignored or inappropriately treated. This paper proposes a novel latent pattern mixture model for nonignorable missing values in multivariate categorical outcomes. The proposed model posits the existence of two categorical latent variables; one latent variable represents a nonresponse pattern, and the other represents a response pattern conditioning on the nonresponse pattern. We propose two parameter estimation strategies: the maximum-likelihood (ML) estimation using the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm and Bayesian estimation using the Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm. Simulation studies revealed that the ML estimation is preferred to the Bayesian estimation with noninformative priors in terms of standardized biases given the large sample size, whereas the Bayesian estimation can be preferred when the sample size is small. Finally, our real data example analyzed a data set with parental substance use disorder and revealed six latent classes of participants that are distinguished in response and missingness patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.