Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41640721›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2026

Does prior nasopharyngeal airway dilatation improve nasotracheal intubation with suction catheter guidance? A prospective randomized study.

Karthik S, Subrata Podder, Amarjyoti Hazarika, Parul Gupta, Sohit Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karthik SDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6318-6250
Subrata PodderDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5534-5431
Amarjyoti HazarikaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6563-1477
Parul GuptaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9512-3488
Sohit KumarDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6274-1148

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bleeding during nasotracheal intubation occurs in approximately 80% of cases, caused by injury to the turbinate or avulsion of the mucosa during the passage of the endotracheal tube (ETT). Anatomical variations and sudden changes in direction during the passage of the ETT aggravate the trauma. Among the mechanical and pharmacological methods described to minimize bleeding, the use of a soft malleable guide to railroad the ETT into the hypopharynx and the instillation of vasoconstrictor drops have been found to be effective. Studies comparing added dilation using a nasopharyngeal airway (NPA) dilator with a suction catheter guide are currently lacking. Thus, we hypothesized that the addition of serial dilation of the airway using an NPA over the suction catheter as a guide would improve navigability and minimize bleeding. Methods: American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1 and 2 patients requiring nasotracheal intubation (NTI) were randomized into two groups. In group A, NTI was performed using a suction catheter as a guide, while in group B, NTI was performed using a suction catheter and additional dilation using NPA. Anesthesia was similar in both groups. Navigability, bleeding, and secondary outcomes (number of attempts, side attempts, use of external laryngeal manipulation and Magill forceps, time taken, and hemodynamic changes) were assessed. Results: Ninety patients were enrolled, with 43 and 47 in groups A and B, respectively. Although small improvements in navigability (P = 0.543) and bleeding (P = 0.453) were observed in group B, the differences were not statistically significant. Group B required significantly fewer external laryngeal maneuvers than group A (21 (48.8%) vs. 12 (25.5%), P = 0.022). No differences in the number of attempts, side attempts, time taken, Magill's forceps requirement, oxygen saturation (SPO Conclusion: NPA dilation resulted in improvements in navigability and bleeding.

Indexed as

Airway ManagementCathetersDilatationEpistaxisIntubation, IntratrachealIntubation, NasotrachealRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID41640721
PMCPMC12865299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.