ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2026
Trends in general anesthesia for pediatric dental treatment: a 10-year retrospective analysis at a regional university dental hospital in South Korea.
Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: General anesthesia (GA) is widely used in pediatric dentistry when conventional behavioral management techniques are insufficient, particularly in young children and patients with disabilities. Although the use of GA has increased, comprehensive long-term analyses integrating both dental and anesthetic characteristics in pediatric dental settings remain limited. Methods: This retrospective study included all patients aged <14 years who underwent dental treatment under GA between 2014 and 2023 at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dankook University Jukjeon Dental Hospital, which serves as a regional disability oral health center. Data were extracted from the electronic medical and anesthesia records. Patient demographics, disability status, frequency of GA, types of dental procedures, feasibility of preanesthetic evaluation, anesthetic induction methods, airway management, duration of anesthesia, recovery time, and postoperative complications were reviewed. Results: In total, 1,157 GA procedures were performed in 1,003 patients over a 10-year period, with a steady increase in the annual number of cases. Patients with disabilities comprised 40% of the study population. Caries-related treatments, including restorative, pulpal, and prosthodontic procedures, were performed more frequently in patients with disabilities, whereas minor oral surgery was predominant in patients without disabilities. Inhalational induction with sevoflurane and nasotracheal intubation were the predominant anesthetic approaches used in both groups. Most procedures lasted 60-119 min, and all patients were discharged on the same day. Postanesthesia complications were mild and self-limiting, with respiratory symptoms being the most common. Conclusion: This 10-year retrospective review demonstrates the increasing use of GA in pediatric dentistry at a regional disability oral health center. Distinct differences in dental treatment patterns were observed according to disability status, whereas anesthetic management remained standardized and safe, with a low incidence of serious complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.