ReviewJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2026
Effectiveness of buffered local anesthetic solutions in pediatric nerve blocks and infiltration anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Local anesthesia is essential for pain control and behavioral management in pediatric dentistry. Conventional anesthetic solutions often have low pH, causing injection discomfort and delayed onset. Buffering local anesthetics, typically with sodium bicarbonate, may enhance efficacy by increasing the pH, reducing injection pain, and accelerating onset. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of buffered and unbuffered local anesthetic agents in pediatric dental patients, with an emphasis on the onset of anesthesia, patient-reported pain perception (subjective pain), and clinician-assessed pain responses (objective pain) during injection. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library, LILACS, and Google Scholar for studies published between January 2000 and March 2025. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) specifically focused on pediatric patients aged 4-12 years comparing buffered and unbuffered local anesthetics were included. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (ROB 2) tool. Meta-analyses using a random-effects model with standardized mean differences (SMD) accounted for variability across studies. The review protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251051999). Of the 138 records initially identified through the literature search, five RCTs met the eligibility criteria and were included. When compared with unbuffered solutions, buffered local anesthetics demonstrated a promising trend toward faster onset and reduced subjective pain. Meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in subjective pain scores with buffered agents (SMD = -0.59, 95% CI: -1 to -0.17, P < 0.05, I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.