ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy2026
Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The preparation of injectable chemotherapy drugs is a critical process, given their toxicity and the large number of stakeholders involved. As such, systematic and proactive risk assessment is required. Objective: To analyze the risks associated with the cytotoxic drug preparation process using the failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) method within a centralized cytotoxic drug preparation unit (CCDPU). Methods: An analytical study was conducted in a CCDPU over a 6-month period. The risk analysis was performed using the FMECA method. An action plan was developed to address critical scenarios. A second FMECA cycle was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the implemented actions. Results: A total of 189 failure modes were identified, of which 2% were deemed unacceptable and 30% were tolerable when controlled. An action plan was developed based on training, double visual inspection, and the implementation of analytical control. During the follow-up FMECA, a reduction of 23% in the overall criticality index was observed, with a significant improvement in criticality levels. Of the 60 actions, 73% were completed, and an updated action plan was proposed. Conclusion: These results demonstrate the CCDPU team's genuine commitment to risk management and the usefulness of the FMECA method in a continuous improvement approach to the cytotoxic preparation circuit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.