Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41640639›Full record

ReviewNational science review2026

The funding effectiveness in chemistry at the National Natural Science Foundation of China: research progress on the fundamentals and applications of zeolite materials.

Wei-Li Dai, Li-Hua Chen, Chang Yao, Bao-Lian Su, Jun-Lin Yang, Fei-Xue Gao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in National science review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei-Li DaiDepartment of Chemical Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing 100085, China.
Li-Hua ChenSchool of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Chang YaoDepartment of Chemical Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing 100085, China.
Bao-Lian SuSchool of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Life Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8474-0652
Jun-Lin YangDepartment of Chemical Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing 100085, China.
Fei-Xue GaoDepartment of Chemical Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing 100085, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zeolites have undergone a significant development, leading to their widespread application in catalytic processes. China plays a pivotal role in the rapid growth of pioneering zeolite research. The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) has facilitated the transition of Chinese scientists from a position of research followers to a leading role on the global stage. The future development of zeolite science and technology in China depends on the sustained provision of innovations, advanced techniques and effective scientific funding from the Chinese government, including the NSFC. This paper firstly provides a comprehensive review of the funding projects in the field of zeolite research from the NSFC. Subsequently, a spotlight on new zeolite synthesis, novel characterization techniques and zeolite applications is presented to reveal the significance and effectiveness of these fundings. Finally, the future prospects of the NSFC supports in zeolites are envisaged.

Indexed as

adsorption and diffusioncatalysisfunding effectivenessscience fundingzeolite

Identifiers

PMID41640639
PMCPMC12866667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.