Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41640570›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026

Preoperative ultrasound before sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma in the era of neoadjuvant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance and cost analysis.

Julia A van den Broek, Antonius W Schurink, Brenda Leeneman, Tessa Brabander, Astrid A M van der Veldt, Cornelius Verhoef, Dirk J Grünhagen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia A van den BroekDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Antonius W SchurinkDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Brenda LeenemanErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Department of Health Technology Assessment, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Tessa BrabanderDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Astrid A M van der VeldtDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Cornelius VerhoefDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Dirk J GrünhagenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy improves outcomes compared to adjuvant therapy in stage III melanoma and reduces costs when adjuvant therapy is omitted following a major pathological response (MPR). However, adjuvant therapy remains the sole systemic treatment for patients identified as stage III by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Detecting nodal metastases prior to this procedure could be beneficial. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the accuracy of preoperative ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and the healthcare costs of implementing this strategy. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched up to March 21, 2025. Diagnostic cohort studies were included when preoperative ultrasound and/or FNAC were performed in patients with cutaneous melanoma eligible for SLNB, with histopathological confirmation. Studies that lacked individual patient-level diagnostic data were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using bivariate or univariate random-effects models. The associated healthcare costs for each strategy were calculated using the pooled estimates, costs of the procedure, therapies and follow-up. Findings: Of 1315 records screened, 19 diagnostic studies comprising 7396 patients were included. For ultrasound, pooled sensitivity was 33.6% (95% CI: 23.5-45.5%) and specificity 92.4% (87.3-95.6%). For FNAC, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 92.6% (15.9-99.9%) and 99.1% (96.6-99.8%). Most studies had unclear risk of bias in patient selection and index test domains, while applicability concerns were generally low. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies. Ultrasound-FNAC was estimated to detect approximately 31% (8/25.5) of nodal metastases preoperatively. Implementation of this strategy was cost saving across multiple scenarios where adjuvant immunotherapy was omitted following MPR. Interpretation: Implementation of ultrasound-FNAC prior to sentinel lymph node biopsy enables neoadjuvant immunotherapy and is cost saving, indicating potential value in routine clinical practice. Funding: None.

Indexed as

Cost analysisDiagnostic accuracyMelanomaSentinel lymph node biopsyUltrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration

Identifiers

PMID41640570
PMCPMC12865617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.