Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41640552›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2025

Surgical site infections following emergency abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Mert Adali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mert AdaliBursa Yuksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital of Health Sciences University, General Surgery Clinic, Bursa, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is of major concern in surgical patients due to increased morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospital stay, increased need for intensive care, increased costs and hospital readmissions. The main objective of this study was to define the incidence and risk factors associated with SSI in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study. Patients over the age of 18 who underwent emergency abdominal surgery were included in this study. [ma1]Patients under 18 years of age, who underwent elective surgery and who underwent procedures outside the abdomen were excluded from the study. Wound assessments were performed according to ASEPSIS score. Results: A total of 130 patients were included in the study. The incidence of SSI was found to be 10.0%. The prevalence of SSI was 27.5% (8/29) in patients operated for intestinal obstruction and 4.9% (5/101) in other patients (p=0.001). [ma2]Predictors[ma3] of SSI were open surgical approach, contaminated/dirty wound group, intestinal obstruction, colorectal surgery, increasing incision length[ma4] and age. Conclusion: This study identified several independent risk factors for SSI after emergency abdominal surgery that need to be addressed. [ma5].

Indexed as

AbdomenSurgical Wound InfectionAcute Care SurgeryAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAbdominal surgeryASEPSISEmergency surgerySurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID41640552
PMCPMC12865050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.