ReviewAfrican health sciences2025
Surgical outcomes research in LMICs: a narrative review.
Review in African health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Survival Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Barriers and Facilitators to Collecting Surgical Outcome Data in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An International Survey.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgical outcomes research is sparse in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This is due to poor funding, lack of human resources, and inadequate infrastructure. However, a growing number of collaborative small collection of large multinational and multicentered studies have been successfully performed. These studies have overcome regulatory and logistical hurdles and have shown that collecting such data in the LMIC setting is possible.underscore the drive and capabilities of LMIC researchers. Methods: A review of the literature using PubMed was performed for multicenter and multinational studies on surgical outcomes in LMICs. Results: All studies collected a diverse array of postoperative outcomes including complications and mortality. Multiple studies performed adjusted analyses to allow for identification of independent risk factors of surgical outcomes. Each study reinforced that outcomes in LMICs are markedly worse than in HICs. Conclusion: These studies showed that outcomes research is feasible and needed in LMICs. In this review we summarize each of these impactful studies and present strengths, weaknesses, commonalities and gaps that remain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.