Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41640481›Full record

ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2025

Assessing melanoma patients' satisfaction with treatment and clinical care: preliminary findings from a novel regional pilot program.

Marcin Ziętek, Maciej Nowacki, Jędrzej Wierzbicki, Katarzyna Nowacka, Igor Madej, Edyta Pawlak, Adam Maciejczyk, Rafał Matkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Survivorship care for melanoma patients: a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marcin ZiętekLower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Wroclaw, Poland.
Maciej NowackiLower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Wroclaw, Poland.
Jędrzej WierzbickiLower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Wroclaw, Poland.
Katarzyna NowackaCosmetology and Aesthetic Dermatology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.
Igor MadejLower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Wroclaw, Poland.
Edyta PawlakLaboratory of Immunopathology, Department of Experimental Therapy, Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland.
Adam MaciejczykLower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Wroclaw, Poland.
Rafał MatkowskiLower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Wroclaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of newly diagnosed melanoma patients has significantly increased over the past few decades. In recent years, in addition to developing new diagnostic and preventive strategies, cancer centres have prioritized the establishment of highly specialised melanoma units (MUs), offering the implementation of an adequate follow-up plan, along with the evaluation of overall patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the patient satisfaction of treatment and clinical care provided in multidisciplinary MUs. Material and methods: The study was based on the analysis of results from a survey administered to all melanoma patients treated at the Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Haematology Centre (LSOPHC) in Wroclaw. The questionnaire was a part of a pilot program for melanoma patients in the Lower Silesian Voivodeship (inhabited by approximately 2.9 million people). Results: A total of 432 patients diagnosed with melanoma between May 2020 and February 2023 participated in the study. The study successfully gathered results concerning four key aspects outlined in the developed questionnaire: 1) infrastructure and organisation of treatment, 2) quality of medical care, 3) scope of information provided to patients, and 4) overall satisfaction with the pilot program. Conclusions: Detailed questions in the survey yielded specific data highlighting both strengths and weaknesses of care provided to patients enrolled in the pilot program. The results of the patient satisfaction assessment may offer valuable insights for other MUs.

Indexed as

follow-upmelanomamelanoma unitpatient satisfactionquality of lifesurvey

Identifiers

PMID41640481
PMCPMC12866533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.