ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2025
Assessing melanoma patients' satisfaction with treatment and clinical care: preliminary findings from a novel regional pilot program.
Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Survivorship care for melanoma patients: a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The incidence of newly diagnosed melanoma patients has significantly increased over the past few decades. In recent years, in addition to developing new diagnostic and preventive strategies, cancer centres have prioritized the establishment of highly specialised melanoma units (MUs), offering the implementation of an adequate follow-up plan, along with the evaluation of overall patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the patient satisfaction of treatment and clinical care provided in multidisciplinary MUs. Material and methods: The study was based on the analysis of results from a survey administered to all melanoma patients treated at the Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Haematology Centre (LSOPHC) in Wroclaw. The questionnaire was a part of a pilot program for melanoma patients in the Lower Silesian Voivodeship (inhabited by approximately 2.9 million people). Results: A total of 432 patients diagnosed with melanoma between May 2020 and February 2023 participated in the study. The study successfully gathered results concerning four key aspects outlined in the developed questionnaire: 1) infrastructure and organisation of treatment, 2) quality of medical care, 3) scope of information provided to patients, and 4) overall satisfaction with the pilot program. Conclusions: Detailed questions in the survey yielded specific data highlighting both strengths and weaknesses of care provided to patients enrolled in the pilot program. The results of the patient satisfaction assessment may offer valuable insights for other MUs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.