ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2025
Adverse reactions to intravenous immunoglobulin in primary immunodeficiency: a retrospective analysis.
Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Some diseases, including primary immunodeficiencies (PID), require treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). IVIG is an effective treatment and is generally well tolerated. IVIG can cause side effects ranging from mild reactions to, in rare cases, serious complications such as anaphylaxis. Aim: We aimed to assess the frequency, types, and severity of adverse effects in adults receiving IVIG for PID, and to examine associated risk factors and the impact of premedication. Material and methods: This retrospective cohort study analysed 90 patients and 6246 IVIG infusions administered at the Gülhane Training and Research Hospital between 2016 and 2024. Demographic data, comorbidities, IVIG-related side effects, and treatment processes of the patients were examined. Results: A total of 6246 IVIG infusions were evaluated, 363 (5.8%) of which had side effects. Side effects mostly occurred within the first 6 h of infusion (early reaction) (75.2%). The most frequently preferred intervention was to reduce the infusion rate (37.5%), followed by stopping the treatment (27.5%) and using antihistamines (22.5%). Serious cases such as anaphylaxis were rare (0.12%) and could be controlled with appropriate interventions. The rate of side effects was significantly lower in patients who received premedication. Conclusions: Our study highlights that side effects associated with IVIG treatment are generally mild and manageable, but careful monitoring and individualized premedication protocols are important for preventing side effects and patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.