Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41640474›Full record

ReviewPostepy dermatologii i alergologii2025

Public behaviours toward patients with dermatological diseases: a comprehensive review of public perception determinants.

Hamad Alfahaad, Soliman Alsaiari, Wadha Alfarwan, Anwar Farhan, Saeed Alahmari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hamad AlfahaadCollege of Medicine, Najran University Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Soliman AlsaiariCollege of Medicine, Najran University Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Wadha AlfarwanMinistry of Health, Najran Branch, Saudi Arabia.
Anwar FarhanKing Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Saeed AlahmariFirst Medical Center, PSS, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Public perceptions of skin diseases can cause stigma, leading to embarrassment, isolation, and poor quality of life. This may prevent treatment, delay diagnosis, and increase healthcare costs. To improve outcomes, healthcare policies should promote accurate perceptions and better patient care. Aim: This review examines the impact of stereotypes, stigma, media influence, and cultural factors on the perception, knowledge and attitudes of the public towards individuals with skin diseases and discussing the implications for healthcare practices and patient outcomes. Methods: A thorough literature review was conducted of the main databases available for health research - PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar - using keywords related to public perception, knowledge, attitudes, stigma, and skin diseases. To ensure the reliability of the extracted data, two reviewers conducted the review independently and combined their findings. For analysis of the collated data, thematic analysis was then employed so that the key themes from the selected studies could be rigorously identified and explored. Results: Key findings include different levels of awareness among the public, the influence of information sources such as healthcare providers, the media, and personal experiences. Factors such as education, socioeconomic status, personal experiences, and the influence of the healthcare providers also play important roles in shaping the perception, knowledge, and attitudes. Conclusions: Overall, this review underscores the need for collaborative efforts across different sectors aimed at promoting accurate knowledge, empathy, and inclusivity towards individuals with skin diseases.

Indexed as

healthcare practiceshealth promotionpublic perceptionskin diseases

Identifiers

PMID41640474
PMCPMC12866548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.