ReviewPostepy dermatologii i alergologii2025
Public behaviours toward patients with dermatological diseases: a comprehensive review of public perception determinants.
Review in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Skin Health Literacy in Ontario Secondary Schools: An Overlooked Opportunity for Preventive Health Education.The Journal of school health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Public perceptions of skin diseases can cause stigma, leading to embarrassment, isolation, and poor quality of life. This may prevent treatment, delay diagnosis, and increase healthcare costs. To improve outcomes, healthcare policies should promote accurate perceptions and better patient care. Aim: This review examines the impact of stereotypes, stigma, media influence, and cultural factors on the perception, knowledge and attitudes of the public towards individuals with skin diseases and discussing the implications for healthcare practices and patient outcomes. Methods: A thorough literature review was conducted of the main databases available for health research - PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar - using keywords related to public perception, knowledge, attitudes, stigma, and skin diseases. To ensure the reliability of the extracted data, two reviewers conducted the review independently and combined their findings. For analysis of the collated data, thematic analysis was then employed so that the key themes from the selected studies could be rigorously identified and explored. Results: Key findings include different levels of awareness among the public, the influence of information sources such as healthcare providers, the media, and personal experiences. Factors such as education, socioeconomic status, personal experiences, and the influence of the healthcare providers also play important roles in shaping the perception, knowledge, and attitudes. Conclusions: Overall, this review underscores the need for collaborative efforts across different sectors aimed at promoting accurate knowledge, empathy, and inclusivity towards individuals with skin diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.