ArticleAI and ethics2026
Embedding ethics up front in AI and robotics: evidence from future engineers.
Article in AI and ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As artificial intelligence and robotics increasingly shape societies, ensuring that these technologies align with ethical and societal values is a pressing challenge. This paper presents survey findings from 98 MSc Robotics and Applied AI students at Cranfield University, offering rare empirical evidence of how future AI and robotics professionals perceive their ethical responsibilities. While students demonstrate strong awareness of key risks such as autonomous decision-making in warfare, surveillance, labour displacement, and emotional manipulation, they show limited engagement with professional codes of ethics or structured training. Instead, ethical reflection often occurs informally, through peer discussions or media exposure. These findings highlight a consistent gap between ethical awareness and institutionalised engagement, raising questions about how future engineers will navigate the ethical challenges of AI. To address this, the paper proposes an "ethics up front" model for ethics integration that embeds reflection early in the development lifecycle, supported by participatory design, professional education, and regulatory alignment. This paper provides empirical evidence on future AI engineers' ethical orientations and proposes a practical model for early-stage ethics integration into the practice of AI and robotics engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.