Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41640436›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025

Emerging minimally invasive laser and light-based therapies for glioblastoma: a systematic review.

José Geraldo Medeiros Netto, Lizen Clare André Moreira, Rafaella Mafezoni, Clara Peixoto Cirillo Costa, Lucas Longo Ferreira, Billy McBenedict, Bruno Lima Pessôa

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

José Geraldo Medeiros NettoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Antônio Pedro University Hospital, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, Brazil.
Lizen Clare André MoreiraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Antônio Pedro University Hospital, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, Brazil.
Rafaella MafezoniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Antônio Pedro University Hospital, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, Brazil.
Clara Peixoto Cirillo CostaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Antônio Pedro University Hospital, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, Brazil.
Lucas Longo FerreiraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Antônio Pedro University Hospital, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, Brazil.
Billy McBenedictDepartment of Neurosurgery, Antônio Pedro University Hospital, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, Brazil.
Bruno Lima PessôaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Antônio Pedro University Hospital, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Glioblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor. Standard treatment involves surgical resection with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, but tumors in deep or eloquent brain regions often limit surgical options. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) have emerged as minimally invasive alternatives. Materials and methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, ROBINS-I, and RoB 2 tools. Data extraction included tumor characteristics, survival outcomes, quality of life, treatment response, and complications. Results: A total of 1,468 records were identified; after screening and eligibility assessment, 11 studies involving patients aged 16-86 were included. LITT was found to be safe and effective for recurrent glioblastoma, with 12-month survival rates up to 65%, particularly in patients with small, deep-seated tumors and high Karnofsky scores. PDT, when combined with gross total resection, reduced postoperative edema and improved survival but was associated with higher rates of distant recurrence. Discussion: LITT and PDT are promising minimally invasive strategies for glioblastoma management, each with distinct mechanisms and clinical roles. LITT is most beneficial for deep-seated, unresectable tumors and may enhance tumor immunogenicity. PDT, though limited by shallow light penetration, effectively eliminates residual tumor cells post-resection and may reduce local recurrence. However, variability in patient selection, tumor features, and treatment protocols across studies limits direct comparison. Adverse events, while generally manageable, require close monitoring. Current evidence supports the adjunctive use of both therapies, but large-scale randomized trials are needed to confirm efficacy, standardize protocols, and explore combinations with immunotherapy. Conclusion: LITT and PDT are safe and effective adjunct therapies for glioblastoma patients, improving survival and reducing complications in selected patients. LITT mostly benefits patients with small, deep, or unresectable tumors, while PDT enhances outcomes when combined with gross total resection. Further large-scale trials are needed to optimize their use and refine patient selection.

Indexed as

GBMglioblastomagrade IV astrocytomalaser interstitial thermal therapyLITTPDTphotodynamic therapysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41640436
PMCPMC12864125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.