Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41640419›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026

The effect of AI-assisted bedside echocardiography on inpatient care: a prospective trial.

Shir Frydman, Ophir Freund, Rose Miller, Neta Sror, Nevo Barel, Guy Baruch, Ehud Rothschild, Roei Merin, Oron Shporn, Maayan Ohad and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shir FrydmanDepartment of Cardiology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizman St, Tel -Aviv 64239, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8882-9109
Ophir FreundFaculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel -Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7272-5284
Rose MillerFaculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel -Aviv, Israel.
Neta SrorFaculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel -Aviv, Israel.
Nevo BarelFaculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel -Aviv, Israel.
Guy BaruchFaculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel -Aviv, Israel.
Ehud RothschildFaculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel -Aviv, Israel.
Roei MerinFaculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel -Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2040-020X
Oron ShpornFaculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel -Aviv, Israel.
Maayan OhadFaculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel -Aviv, Israel.
Yan TopilskyDepartment of Cardiology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizman St, Tel -Aviv 64239, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2269-802X
Rami HershkovitzFaculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel -Aviv, Israel.
Gil BornsteinFaculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel -Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) can yield valuable information for decision-making. However, it is limited by the skills required to acquire and interpret high-quality images. Machine learning algorithms can help mitigate this gap by providing guidance for optimal image acquisition and interpretation. We aimed to evaluate the impact of an artificial intelligence (AI) assisted, FDA-cleared FoCUS platform on clinical decision-making. Methods and results: This was a prospective trial with pre and post sequential allocation, conducted in two internal medicine departments. During the first 2 months, physicians with no formal echocardiography training used a common commercial FoCUS device as a complementary tool for their bedside patient evaluations. Then, during the following 4 months, an AI cloud-based platform was added, providing real-time feedback for image acquisition and AI-based echocardiographic results. The primary outcome was change in care following FoCUS, as reported by physicians after the examination and verified by assessors, which was analysed by generalized linear mixed model accounting for physician and department effects. Two hundred and eighty-one patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent FoCUS, 110 (39%) without AI assistance (control) and 171 with the AI. The most common reasons for FoCUS were worsening dyspnoea (50%) and chest pain (20%). A non-significant trend was observed in physician-reported new echocardiographic findings towards the AI group (43% vs.34%, Conclusion: AI-assisted FoCUS led to a higher rate of treatment plan changes, highlighting its potential to enhance bedside cardiac evaluation and optimize patient management.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceClinical decisionsDiagnostic supportEchocardiography

Identifiers

PMID41640419
PMCPMC12866993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.