Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41640412›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Reestablishment of an algae-bacteria pest model using continuous passage in the laboratory.

Thuy M Nguyen, W K N L Abeykoon, Alina A Corcoran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thuy M NguyenDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States.
W K N L AbeykoonDepartment of Civil Engineering, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States.
Alina A CorcoranDepartment of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The paucity of laboratory models comprising predatory bacteria infecting microalgae hinders our understanding of bacteria that predate or parasitize algae both in aquatic ecosystems as well as algal cultivation systems. In 2015, a novel predatory bacterium was found in open cultivation ponds of Methods: In this study, we continuously passaged two infection sources of an FD111-like pest collected in the field in 2023 into two cultures of Results: Continued passaging of the infection source to healthy algal cultures was a reliable approach to maintain pest viability in the lab, although it did not help to enrich the pest concentration, likely due to the timing of each passage. Following each passage, infected cultures deteriorated and, after four days, died. Transmission electron microscopy showed that a pest similar to FD111 attached to Discussion: This paper shows that continuous passage can be an alternative approach to isolation and cultivation of pests, and lays the groundwork for additional research and development on this and similar pests. The finding that cultures crashed with a putative pest of low abundance suggests that this pest could be a keystone species in aquatic ponds. Additional work is needed to determine the mechanisms of infection and inform crop protection strategies.

Indexed as

FD111microalgaeNannochloropsisOligoflexusparasitepredatory bacteriumPseudobacteriovorax

Identifiers

PMID41640412
PMCPMC12865303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.