ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Incorporating Refugia Capacity in Assessing Plant Climate Vulnerability: A Study Case on Alpine Endemics.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contrasting Climate Change Responses of the Rare Moss GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Incorporating Refugia Capacity in Assessing Plant Climate Vulnerability: A Study Case on Alpine Endemics.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anthropogenic climate change is a major threat to biodiversity in mountain ecosystems, particularly when hosting endemic species with limited ranges of distribution and low dispersal ability. These species may persist in situ if climatic conditions remain within their tolerance limits, or they can shift their range by tracking suitable habitats. We assessed the potential impact of global warming on seven endemic plant species, considering how different refugia types support species survival. Western Alps. We classified persistence areas into three categories: long-term refugia (stable suitable areas across time), holdouts (temporarily suitable areas) and stepping stones (short-term habitats facilitating range shifts). We used species distribution models to evaluate the potential impact of climate change on seven species, endemic to the South-western Alps, examining how different refugia types support their survival and whether these patterns are species-specific. We modelled habitat suitability under two climate scenarios (SSP245 and SSP585) across three future time slices, from 2021 to 2080, using five predictive models. Our results suggest that habitat suitability declines for most populations, but those of high elevation are less affected, often gaining suitability at higher elevations while losing it at lower ones. Long-term refugia are the most common persistence type under moderate climate change, whereas holdouts dominate under extreme. Stepping stones are rare, suggesting that these species may struggle to track shifting climates. The distribution of refugia types follows an elevational gradient, with long-term refugia at higher elevations and holdouts at mid-elevations. Our findings highlight the vulnerability of Alpine endemics to climate change and emphasise the importance of conservation strategies that account for range shifts, also by active translocation, to ensure their long-term survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.