Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41640323›Full record

ArticleBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2026

Midwifery Care Studies: A Reflexive Methodology for a Practice-Based Science.

Annekatrin Skeide

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Annekatrin SkeideCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Midwifery, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6247-4410

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMidwifery research is increasingly understood as shaped by the specific social, political, and historical contexts, with scientific practices actively co-producing realities. This recently developed perspective highlights the need for discipline-specific approaches that reflect the diversity and creativity of midwifery care.

aimThis contribution introduces Midwifery Care Studies as a novel, reflexive approach to studying midwifery as a practice-based science.

findingsBuilding on analyses inspired by feminist science studies, Midwifery Care Studies examine midwifery care in practice. Using participatory methods, this approach aimed to investigate midwifery care practices on their own terms. DISCUSSION: Midwifery Care Studies share the sensitivities and response-abilities that shape everyday midwifery care practices. Acknowledging the relational character of midwifery care, Midwifery Care Studies articulate modes and techniques of becoming-with that involve birth givers, fetuses, midwives, technologies, words, values, and birthing environments. By carving out the material, social, and ethical specificities of situated midwifery care practices, Midwifery Care Studies examine unfolding and shifting "goods" and "bads" in practice, as well as how tensions between them are handled.

conclusionSensitive to the ontological politics of care and research practices, Midwifery Care Studies aim at providing the analytical and conceptual resources needed to foster generative engagements with the multitude of lived realities of being pregnant and giving birth.

Indexed as

MidwiferyNursing ResearchFemaleFeminismHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41640323
PMCPMC13471950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.