ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2026
Adherence of Swedish primary health care practitioners to diagnostic guidelines for IBS.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common condition that should be diagnosed using the Rome criteria and limited laboratory testing. The aim of this retrospective, medical record-based study was to evaluate the adherence of Swedish primary health care practitioners to diagnostic guidelines for IBS.
methodsUsing the electronic patient register in primary care, we identified 1943 new IBS cases in patients aged 18-65 between January 2015 and December 2019 in Region Örebro County. A random sample of 400 patients was selected and their medical records were scrutinized to evaluate diagnostic methods.
resultsOf the 309 eligible medical records, only 36.2% of patients met the Rome III or IV criteria. The criteria were explicitly documented in 4.9% of cases, and subclassification was noted in 5.5%. There were no significant differences in diagnostic practices between GPs and other physicians. Only 9.4% were diagnosed without laboratory testing, although 69.9% did not undergo all recommended tests according to local guidelines. Rectoscopy was performed in 14.2%, while 9.7% and 5.8% of patients were referred for colonoscopy or CT, respectively, with significantly higher referral rates in patients over 40 years. Men were more frequently referred for colonoscopy while other diagnostic procedures showed no significant sex differences.
conclusionsAdherence to IBS diagnostic guidelines in Swedish primary care seems to be limited among both GPs and non-GPs. The documented use of Rome criteria is minimal, and guideline-compliant laboratory testing is insufficient. Increased awareness and structured implementation of IBS diagnostic criteria are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.