ArticlePalliative & supportive care2026
Development and implementation of a cancer pain intervention registry: An Australian pilot study with preliminary outcome evaluation from 2 tertiary centers.
Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo pilot a registry to evaluate the use and effectiveness of interventional cancer pain management.
methodsUpon interventional pain procedure scheduling, patient demographics, cancer, and pain information were entered into the longitudinal clinical registry in 2 tertiary hospitals in Sydney, Australia (Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Chris O'Brien Lifehouse). Details of the procedure (including proceduralist, nature of the intervention, and site of treatment), post-procedure patient-reported outcomes and quality of life surveys, adverse events, and mortality data (when known) were collected longitudinally.
resultsBetween October 2021 and March 2023, 48 patients underwent 55 procedures. Procedures included treatment targeting autonomic plexuses, peripheral nerves, fascial planes, and neuraxial structures. Celiac plexus neurolysis was the most frequently reported procedure (33.3%). Post-procedure, there was a trend in reduction in pain intensity on the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System ( SIGNIFICANCE OF
resultsThis is a vital first step in creating a more widely applicable registry evaluating cancer pain intervention. It provided valuable information on the range of available pain intervention procedures and data on patient-reported outcome measures using validated instruments. This will facilitate a timely review of clinical practice to improve future patient care. An Australian-wide database of cancer pain will be a valuable next step in the improvement of cancer pain management.
trial registration
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.