Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41640155›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of biological anthropology2026

A Strong Supporter: Evidence for the Role of the Fifth Finger in Habitual Gripping Activity.

Cora Leder, Sarah A Schrader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of biological anthropology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cora LederLaboratory for Human Osteoarchaeology, Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3028-3593
Sarah A SchraderLaboratory for Human Osteoarchaeology, Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0424-6748

Funding

Aard- en Levenswetenschappen, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe fifth finger plays a key role in manual dexterity, yet its habitual use and functional integration within the hand remain poorly understood. This study investigates the contribution of the fifth ray to habitual gripping activities and its synergistic relationship with the thumb. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe "Validated Entheses-based Reconstruction of Activity" (VERA) method and multivariate statistical analyses were applied to the hand bones of 43 adult male/probable male individuals from three post-Medieval skeletal collections in the Netherlands. Principal component and pairwise correlation analyses were used to assess covariation among entheseal attachment sites, with particular focus on the opponens digiti minimi (ODM) and third palmar interosseous (PI3).

resultsBoth analyses reproduced functional patterns established in previous VERA studies that distinguish precision from power gripping. The ODM clustered with thumb muscles involved in precision grasping, especially the opponens pollicis (OP), suggesting habitual coordination between the fifth finger and thumb. In contrast, the PI3 formed an independent axis of variation and showed weak correlations with other entheses once overall size effects were removed. DISCUSSION: The findings indicate that the fifth finger functions as a stabilizing and supportive element across both grip types, contributing to object control and manual stability through its opposition to the thumb and flexion at the MCP joint. This study underscores the functional significance of the fifth ray in habitual manual activity and highlights the value of size-adjusted VERA analyses for detecting subtle patterns of hand use in past populations.

Indexed as

FingersHand StrengthAdultHumansMaleNetherlandsentheseal attachment sitesfifth fingerhabitual activity“validated entheses‐based reconstruction of activity” method

Identifiers

PMID41640155
PMCPMC12873511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.