Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41640117›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2026

The Potential Effect of Ending Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Funding for HIV Tests: A Modeling Study in 18 States.

Ruchita Balasubramanian, Melissa Schnure, Ryan Forster, William P Hanage, D Scott Batey, Keri N Althoff, Kelly A Gebo, David W Dowdy, Maunank Shah, Parastu Kasaie and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ruchita BalasubramanianDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9151-9873
Melissa SchnureDepartment of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ryan ForsterDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
William P HanageDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6319-7336
D Scott BateyTulane School of Social Work, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2422-5787
Keri N AlthoffDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5068-6595
Kelly A GeboDepartment of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
David W DowdyDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Maunank ShahDepartment of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Parastu KasaieDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3744-9501
Anthony T FojoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Ending the HIV Epidemic in Rural America (EHE-RA): Local Interventions, Co-Epidemics, and Social DeterminantsR01MD018539 · NIMHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Anthony Todd Fojo · 2022 to 2026
$4.0M
NIH HHS R01MD018539NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD018539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely HIV diagnosis and treatment is critical to preventing transmission. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides funding for HIV testing to local health departments and community organizations. We sought to estimate the number of additional HIV infections that would result from ending or interrupting CDC funding for HIV tests in US states.

methodsWe used a validated model of HIV transmission to simulate HIV epidemics in 18 US states. We projected incidence forward under 3 scenarios where all CDC-funded HIV testing ends in October 2025 and (1) never resumes, (2) returns to previous levels between January and December 2027, and (3) returns from January to December 2029. We calculated the excess incident HIV infections compared to a scenario where CDC-funded testing continues uninterrupted.

resultsIf CDC funding for HIV tests were to end on 1 October 2025, we project 12 719 additional HIV infections across 18 states by 2030 (95% credible interval, 4547-21 896)-an increase of 10%. The projected effects varied by state, ranging from a 2.7% increase in Washington (1.0%-4.7%) to a 29.9 increase in Louisiana (9.4%-59.9%). States that perform more CDC-funded tests and states with more rural HIV epidemics were projected to see greater rises in incidence.

conclusionsDisruptions to CDC-funded HIV testing would substantially increase new infections, particularly in states with more rural epidemics. These findings demonstrate the value of the CDC's HIV testing activities in curbing the spread of HIV in the United States.

Indexed as

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.HIV InfectionsHIV TestingHumansIncidenceMass ScreeningModels, TheoreticalUnited StatesCDCHIV/AIDSHIV testingmathematical modelingUSA

Identifiers

PMID41640117
PMCPMC13131942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.