Trial reportEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2026
Additive prognostic value of functional performance to coronary artery anatomy: the ISCHEMIA trial.
Trial report in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo assess whether baseline functional performance assessed by exercise treadmill stress testing (EST) has additive value to coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for risk stratification among patients with chronic coronary disease (CCD) and moderate or severe ischaemia. METHODS AND
resultsWe performed a subgroup analysis of the ISCHEMIA trial including participants who underwent EST and CCTA. EST data and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) on CCTA were evaluated by core laboratories, blinded to clinical data and results of the other tests. The primary outcome for this analysis was all-cause death. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (MI), MI and a composite of cardiovascular death, MI, or hospitalization for heart failure, unstable angina, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. EST and the number of vessels diseased on CCTA were both interpretable in 1864 patients (median age 62 years, IQR 55-68, 83% males). During a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 69 patients died. Higher peak metabolic equivalents (METs) achieved on the qualifying stress test was associated with lower all-cause death (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76-0.98; P = 0.025). The addition of peak METs to CAD severity improved the predictive ability of the all-cause death and CV death models by 10-20% and 8-13% respectively, depending on the metrics used for CCTA. Adding peak METs to CCTA anatomical models resulted in better prediction of MI by 11-17%, cardiovascular death or MI by 10-14%, and 5-component composite outcome by 12-16%.
conclusionPeak METs on EST, a marker of functional performance, added prognostic value to models including CCTA anatomical findings in patients with CCD and moderate or severe ischaemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.