Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41639893›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2026

Prognostic models for mortality and hospitalisation risk in a contemporary Australian chronic obstructive pulmonary disease cohort.

Luke A Smith, Minyan Zeng, Alix Bird, Anand Rose, Sutapa Mukherjee, Lyle J Palmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luke A SmithAustralian Institute for Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. luke.a.smith@adelaide.edu.au.
Minyan ZengAustralian Institute for Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Alix BirdAustralian Institute for Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Anand RoseDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Sutapa MukherjeeDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Lyle J PalmerAustralian Institute for Machine Learning, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) poses significant public health and economic challenges and performant prognostic models may be useful to direct treatment. The purpose of this study was to develop predictive models, validate the DOSE and updated ADO predictive models, and identify predictors of future hospitalisation and mortality in contemporary Australian COPD patients.

methodsData from 8,578 inpatients and outpatients diagnosed with COPD (via post-bronchodilator spirometry) between 2006 and 2021 at a large South Australian tertiary public hospital were analysed. Multivariate logistic models and Cox regression, utilising penalised regularisation in multiply imputed data, were used to investigate predictors of hospitalisation due to COPD exacerbation at 1-, 3-, and 5-years post-diagnosis, and COPD-specific mortality at 3- and 5-years. Haemoglobin-corrected DLCO (DLCOc) was used to extend the DOSE and updated ADO models.

resultsLocally developed models could predict COPD-specific 1-year hospitalisation risk with AUCs 0.80 (95% CI = [0.76, 0.83]) in males and 0.82 (95% CI = [0.78, 0.86]) in females on a temporally distinct hold-out set, with 3- and 5-year AUCs falling within this range. COPD-specific mortality was predicted with AUCs of 0.90 (95% CI = [0.85, 0.94]) and 0.89 (95% CI = [0.84, 0.92]) at 3 and 5 years in females, and 0.90 (95% CI = [0.86, 0.93]) and 0.88 (95% CI = [0.84, 0.92]) in males. Cox regression models predicted survival well in the test set for both females (C-index = 0.88, 95% CI = [0.85, 0.90]) and males (C-index = 0.86, 95% CI = [0.82, 0.88]). Local model performance was superior to that of the DOSE and updated ADO models for all outcomes, although not always significantly. Among the selected predictors, reduced DLCOc was strongly predictive of all outcomes. and acts as a short-term survival risk for follow-up durations less than 10 years. There was no significant difference in performance between sex, and there were differences in selected features and feature strength between sexes. Extending the extant clinical models with DLCOc significantly improved updated ADO and DOSE model fit and improved discriminatory performance, with the extended ADO index achieving AUC of 0.77 (95% CI = [0.75, 0.79]) and 0.87 (95% CI = [0.84, 0.89]) for predicting 5-year hospitalisation and mortality respectively across the full cohort. The extended DOSE index performed similarly with AUCs 0.77 (95% CI = [0.75, 0.79]) and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.83, 0.89)) for 5-year hospitalisation and mortality.

conclusionsOurs is the only large clinical cohort and prognostic study of Australian COPD patients to date. Locally developed models achieved greater discriminative performance than the original updated ADO and DOSE models within our cohort. Extending the ADO and DOSE models with DLCOc significantly improved model fit in our cohort. We recommend further research into the use of DLCOc as a prognostic index for COPD, and its inclusion in future modelling attempts.

trial registrationRetrospectively registered. Clinical trial number: Not Applicable.

Indexed as

HospitalizationPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsChronic obstructive’ExacerbationMortalityPrognosis‘Pulmonary diseaseRegression

Identifiers

PMID41639893
PMCPMC12964674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.