Observational studyItalian journal of pediatrics2026
Dexmedetomidine for LISA procedure: a prospective observational single center experience.
Observational study in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04820101 (Dexmedetomidine for LISA Procedure in Preterm Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Dexmedetomidine for LISA Procedure in Preterm Infants: a Pilot Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surfactant administration in late preterm and term neonates: is LISA ready for routine use?European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRespiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) is the most common respiratory problem of preterm newborns. The preferred way to manage RDS is with Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA), which involves direct laryngoscopy in spontaneously breathing infants. Despite its widespread diffusion, the optimal sedation protocol for LISA remains unclear. Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenergic agonist, offers sedative and analgesic properties with minimal respiratory depression. This pilot study aims to evaluate dexmedetomidine for LISA procedure focusing on the frequency of adequate sedation (defined as N-PASS score −2 to −5) and analgesia (NIPS score < 4) and adverse events related to dexmedetomidine.
methodsThis is a prospective observational study conducted in our tertiary Italian NICU from May 2021 to July 2024. We enrolled preterm neonates aged between 26+0 to 36+6 weeks, diagnosed with RDS who required LISA. We also analyzed the study population into two groups based on a cut-off of 32 weeks to understand possible differences in adverse events and sedation and analgesia scores, even if this was not our prior aim. Dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) was administered intravenously before LISA. Primary outcomes included pain control assessed by Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) score, sedation adequacy assessed by Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale (N-PASS), and success rate of the procedure (such as laryngoscopy conditions assessed by Goldberg score and number of attempts). We also assessed the safety of the procedure evaluating adverse events, such as intubation rates, apneas/desaturations, bradycardia, and hypotension.
resultsForty-seven preterm newborns received dexmedetomidine. The median (IQR) gestational age (weeks/days), birth weight (grams) and age (hours) at LISA were respectively 29+6 (28+5, 33+1) weeks, 1421 (1069–2074) g, 3 (2.5–6) hours. Pain scores indicated adequate pain control during the procedure (NIPS < 4 in 76% during laryngoscopy). Light sedation (N-PASS −2 to −5) was observed in 23% of patients before the procedure, lasting up to 60 minutes. Excessive sedation (N-PASS −6 to −10) occurred in 7% of babies (3 patients). Laryngoscopy conditions were adequate in 90% of neonates (Goldberg score < 6). Apnea/desaturation with/without bradycardia occurred in 13% of newborns. Six patients were intubated (13%) within 72 hours after the procedure. Hypotension was noted in 6.4% of patients.
conclusionPremedication with dexmedetomidine resulted in a good success rate for pain control; however, an adequate level of sedation was not consistently achieved. While the frequency of adverse events was acceptable, a more rapid-onset sedative may be preferable for this procedure. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to establish an optimal sedation strategy for LISA in preterm newborns.
trial registrationRegister: ClinicalTrials.gov, number ID NCT04820101, enregistered 03–29-2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04820101?cond = RDS&term =dexmedetomidine&rank = 1#study-record-dates .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.