ArticleGlobalization and health2026
U.S. withdrawal from WHO and aid programs: implications and opportunities for Africa's global health security.
Article in Globalization and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Donor dependency and pandemic readiness: insights from the 2026 Ebola Bundibugyo outbreak in the East African community.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The United States has long played a central role in global health through its engagement with the World Health Organization (WHO) and through major bilateral programs, including the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). These investments have contributed to health infrastructure development, disease surveillance, and the expansion of treatment and prevention programs across Africa. The recent U.S. withdrawal from WHO and the freezing of USAID funding raise concerns for infectious disease control, healthcare delivery, and global health security, particularly in settings with high dependence on external financing. This commentary argues that the U.S. withdrawal, while disruptive, should not be understood solely as a setback, but as an opportunity for African governments to assume greater ownership of their health systems and exercise leadership through deliberate political and policy choices. These include increased domestic health financing, stronger institutional governance, and enhanced regional coordination. The paper outlines pathways for sustaining donor-built infrastructure, expanding local pharmaceutical and diagnostic manufacturing, and aligning public–private partnerships with national health priorities. By strengthening domestic capacity and regional cooperation, African governments can reduce vulnerability to external funding shocks, improve outbreak preparedness, and play a more active role in shaping global health security agendas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.