Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41639815›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2026

Adolescents' use of an online Q&A service to enhance their oral health literacy: a mixed-methods text mining and thematic analysis.

Eva Lassemo, Kari Sand, Randi Krog Eftedal, Cecilie Robertsen, Marikken Høiseth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eva LassemoDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway.
Kari SandDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway.
Randi Krog EftedalCenter for Oral Health Services and Research, Mid-Norway (TkMidt), Trondheim, Norway.
Cecilie RobertsenThe Public Dental Services Trøndelag County Authority, Steinkjer, Norway.
Marikken HøisethDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway. marikken.hoiseth@ntnu.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth literacy is fundamental to healthy behaviour, defined as seeking, processing, and evaluating health information to make informed decisions. Access to health information has historically been linked to socioeconomic status (SES), with disparities in health persisting due to unequal access to new health technologies. Digital technologies offer opportunities for spreading health information but may also increase inequalities through a digital divide. The Norwegian government established the website ung.no in 2003 to provide health information to adolescents. This study aims to investigate what oral health information adolescents seek on the ung.no Q&A service and how they use it to build oral health literacy.

methodsThe study analysed 1632 questions posted on the ung.no Q&A service and answered by dentists between January 1, 2020, and May 12, 2023. Data included self-reported gender and age of the individuals posting the questions. Descriptive analyses, text mining, manual coding and qualitative thematic analysis were used to assess the four elements of health literacy: finding, processing, evaluating and utilizing health information.

resultsThe analysis revealed that most questions were posted by girls (65.8%), with the majority coming from the 13–15 age group (55%). Common themes included orthodontic treatment, caries, oral hygiene, finances and the impact of diet and substances on oral health. Adolescents used the Q&A service to seek information, confirm information from other sources, and evaluate options for oral health behaviours and treatments. Many questions reflected concerns about the appearance of teeth, fear of dental procedures and the confidentiality of dental visits. Negative emotions such as stress, fear and shame were prevalent, impacting the adolescents’ ability to process information and make informed decisions.

conclusionThe ung.no Q&A service is a valuable tool for adolescents to increase their oral health literacy. The study highlights the importance of providing clear, accessible information and addressing the emotional factors that influence health behaviours. Dental professionals should focus on building trust, offering empathic communication, and providing proactive guidance to support adolescents in making informed decisions about their oral health.

Indexed as

Data MiningHealth LiteracyInternetOral HealthAdolescentDigital HealthDigital MediaFemaleHumansMaleNorwayAdolescentDecision-makingHealth informationInformation seekingOnline Q&A serviceOral health literacy

Identifiers

PMID41639815
PMCPMC12958716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.