ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Documented rituals in pediatric intensive care: a decade of sacramental and symbolic practices in a pluralistic clinical setting.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRituals with spiritual or symbolic meaning form an integral part of pediatric intensive care, yet their timing, initiators, and contextual functions remain insufficiently described. In secularizing and religiously diverse societies, understanding how such practices are documented and enacted is essential for ethically grounded care. This study characterizes sacramental and symbolic rituals in a German tertiary neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit (NICU/PICU), examining initiation patterns, faith alignment, and survival-related timing.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective descriptive analysis of 135 neonates and infants who received a documented ritual between 2013 and 2024. Rituals were categorized as sacramental or symbolic. Initiators, performers, clinical context, and survival category were recorded. Faith alignment was defined by the correspondence between family affiliation and ritual performer. Data from chaplaincy and clinical documentation were analyzed descriptively.
resultsMost rituals were initiated by healthcare staff (≈ 67%) and performed by clergy (≈ 70%). Rituals occurred across the full range of survival outcomes but clustered in intermediate prognostic categories, where uncertainty was greatest. Symbolic and staff-led rituals were used predominantly in time-critical situations, particularly when clergy were unavailable or denominational alignment was unclear. Cross-faith rituals were rare and mainly observed in acute phases. Ritual-faith congruence increased with longer survival trajectories. No distinct non-sacramental religious rituals were documented, likely reflecting under-capture of informal practices.
conclusionsRitual practice in pediatric intensive care extends well beyond last rites, encompassing symbolic, anticipatory, and adaptively tailored acts integrated into routine clinical care. These patterns reflect the influence of urgency, availability, and cultural diversity on ritual expression. Documentation gaps limit full quantification and underscore the need for prospective, mixed-methods studies and inclusive institutional frameworks for culturally and spiritually responsive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.