ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026
Disproportionality analysis and "perpetrator" or "accomplice" review of Baloxavir marboxil in public FAERS database.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBaloxavir marboxil (Xofluza™) was initially approved for marketing in Japan and the United States in 2018, which is a first-in-class cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor of the influenza virus polymerase PA subunit. Despite indicating that Baloxavir marboxil is effective and well-tolerated through a series of clinical trials, studies on its safety in real-world settings are scarce.
methodsWe conducted a mining analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from Q4 2018 to Q2 2024 to extract adverse events associated with Baloxavir marboxil. Descriptive statistics were first performed to characterize the included reports, covering demographic variables, clinical outcomes, and concomitant medications. We subsequently employed four disproportionality analysis algorithms—ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and MGPS—for signal detection. To verify the robustness of the identified signals, we performed comprehensive subgroup and sensitivity analyses.
resultsA total of 1,765 reports comprising 3,624 adverse events with baloxavir marboxil as the primary suspected drug were identified. Most reports originated from the United States (57.98%), followed by Japan (39.58%) and China (1.82%). Over 65% of reports were submitted by non-consumers. Fatal outcomes were reported in 10.89% of cases. In both the overall study population and the deceased subgroup, hypotensive drugs represented the most frequently reported concomitant medications alongside influenza therapeutics. Eight robust safety signals were ultimately detected: altered state of consciousness, anaphylactic reaction, anaphylactic shock, colitis ischaemic, drug eruption, intentional product use issue, melaena, and no adverse event. Among these, “altered state of consciousness” is not listed in the product label. Several labelled adverse reactions with unestablished causality—rash, urticaria, erythema multiforme, vomiting, delirium, abnormal behavior, and hallucinations—disappeared during subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Additionally, the Ω shrinkage measure for the baloxavir marboxil-warfarin interaction yielded Ω₀₂₅ = 1.42.
conclusionThe eight ultimately detected signals represent robust positive findings. Reactions including rash, urticaria, erythema multiforme, vomiting, delirium, abnormal behavior, and hallucinations were determined to be false positives. The most severe outcome, death, primarily reflected the presence of pre-existing cardiovascular conditions. A potential interaction between baloxavir marboxil and warfarin was identified, warranting further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.